Deconstructing Consent and Culpability: A Critical Evaluation of Section 69 under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023

Authors

  • Dharmendra Sharma D.P. Vipra Law Collage, Sarkanda, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh, India Author
    Competing Interests

    The author declare that he have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Keywords:

Section 69, BNS, consent, deceit, false promise of marriage, sexual autonomy

Abstract

Section 69 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 creates a separate offence for sexual intercourse obtained through deceitful means or a promise to marry made without an intention to fulfil it, where the conduct does not amount to rape. This article evaluates whether the provision supplies a coherent and constitutionally defensible response to deception-based sexual exploitation. It uses doctrinal legal research, examining the statutory text, legislative materials, pre-BNS Supreme Court jurisprudence, and reported Supreme Court and High Court decisions through 31 July 2026. The analysis finds that Section 69 appropriately distinguishes calculated deception from rape, but its language leaves unresolved questions concerning causation, proof of initial intent, the scope of 'deceitful means', electronic evidence, and the relationship between criminal liability and failed consensual relationships. Its gender-specific formulation also excludes male, transgender, and non-binary victims and may conflict with constitutional commitments to equality, privacy, dignity, and decisional autonomy. Recent decisions show courts importing the established distinction between a false promise from inception and a later breach of a genuine promise. The article recommends gender-neutral drafting, a clear reliance requirement, objective indicators of initial fraudulent intent, privacy-sensitive digital-evidence procedures, and structured safeguards against arbitrary arrest.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, Act No. 45 of 2023, s. 69. https://www.indiacode.nic.in/bitstream/123456789/20062/1/a202345.pdf; Ministry of Home Affairs, Notification S.O. 850(E), 23 February 2024 (commencement from 1 July 2024). https://www.mha.gov.in/sites/default/files/BhartiyaNyayaSanhita_24022024.pdf

[2] Indian Penal Code, 1860, Act No. 45 of 1860, ss. 90, 375, and 415.

[3] Pandey, J. K., & Kumar, R. (2025). Governing the algorithmic agent: Confronting overt and covert challenges to justice and the future of work. International Journal of Law Management & Humanities, 8(4), 1974–1984. https://doij.org/10.10000/IJLMH.1110648

[4] Veeraiah, V., Naga Ganesh, C., Bhavagna, L., Pradeep, S., Pandey, J. K., & Gupta, A. (2026). Digital transformation and leadership: Managing transition to a tech-driven business with big data. In Proceedings of the NIELIT International Conference on Communication.

[5] Deepak Gulati v. State of Haryana, (2013) 7 SCC 675.

[6] Dhruvaram Murlidhar Sonar v. State of Maharashtra, (2019) 18 SCC 191.

[7] Maheshwar Tigga v. State of Jharkhand, (2020) 10 SCC 108.

[8] Pramod Suryabhan Pawar v. State of Maharashtra, (2019) 9 SCC 608.

[9] Sonu @ Subhash Kumar v. State of Uttar Pradesh, (2021) 18 SCC 517.

[10] Uday v. State of Karnataka, (2003) 4 SCC 46.

[11] Maheshwari, A., & Sharma, A. (2025). Section 69 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita: A criminal fraud. Vishwakarma University Law Journal, 5(1), 1-18. https://vulj.vupune.ac.in/archives8/Section%2069%20of%20BNS%20A%20Criminal%20Fraud.pdf

[12] Singh, S., & Vikram, K. (2024, November 12). Promises, prejudices and perils: Unveiling the complexities of Section 69, Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. NLIU Law Review Blog. https://nliulawreview.nliu.ac.in/blog/promises-prejudices-and-perils-unveiling-the-complexities-of-section-69-bharatiya-nyaya-sanhita-2023/

[13] Constitution of India, arts. 14, 15, 20(1), and 21.

[14] Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013, Act No. 14 of 2013.

[15] Special Marriage Act, 1954, Act No. 43 of 1954.

[16] Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023, Act No. 47 of 2023, ss. 48 and 61-63. https://www.mha.gov.in/sites/default/files/2024-04/250882_english_01042024_0.pdf

[17] Department-related Parliamentary Standing Committee on Home Affairs. (2023). 246th Report on ‘The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023’. Rajya Sabha Secretariat. https://sansad.in/getFile/rsnew/Committee_site/Committee_File/ReportFile/15/188/246_2023_11_16.pdf?source=rajyasabha

[18] PRS Legislative Research. (2023). The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023: Standing Committee report summary. https://prsindia.org/billtrack/prs-products/standing-committee-report-summary-4278

[19] Harshadeep Girish Parlathaya v. State of Karnataka, W.P. No. 35036 of 2024 (GM-RES) (Karnataka High Court, 4 March 2026). https://indiankanoon.org/doc/27171756/

[20] Neelesh Ramchandani and 2 Others v. State of Uttar Pradesh and 3 Others, Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No. 450 of 2025, 2026:AHC:20369-DB (Allahabad High Court, 29 January 2026). https://elegalix.allahabadhighcourt.in/elegalix/WebDownloadOriginalHCJudgmentDocument.do?translatedJudgmentID=81307

[21] Sayooj S. v. State of Kerala, Bail Application No. 7916 of 2025, 2025:KER:48012 (Kerala High Court, 2 July 2025). https://www.verdictum.in/pdf_upload/2025-ker-48012-1726000.pdf

[22] Akhil N.R. v. State of Kerala, Crl. Appeal No. 660 of 2026, 2026:KER:41967 (Kerala High Court, 12 June 2026). https://indiankanoon.org/doc/65378911/

[23] Prashant v. State (NCT of Delhi), 2024 INSC 879, arising out of SLP (Crl.) No. 2793 of 2024 (Supreme Court of India, 20 November 2024). https://api.sci.gov.in/supremecourt/2024/4198/4198_2024_8_1501_57325_Judgement_20-Nov-2024.pdf

[24] Biswajyoti Chatterjee v. State of West Bengal & Anr., 2025 INSC 458, arising out of SLP (Crl.) No. 4261 of 2024 (Supreme Court of India, 7 April 2025). https://api.sci.gov.in/supremecourt/2024/11440/11440_2024_7_1503_60780_Judgement_07-Apr-2025.pdf

[25] Amol Bhagwan Nehul v. State of Maharashtra & Anr., 2025 INSC 782, arising out of SLP (Crl.) No. 10044 of 2024 (Supreme Court of India, 26 May 2025). https://api.sci.gov.in/supremecourt/2024/32615/32615_2024_5_1501_62109_Judgement_26-May-2025.pdf

[26] Samadhan S/o Sitaram Manmothe v. State of Maharashtra & Anr., 2025 INSC 1351, Criminal Appeal No. 5001 of 2025 (Supreme Court of India, 24 November 2025). https://api.sci.gov.in/supremecourt/2025/19350/19350_2025_4_1502_66141_Judgement_24-Nov-2025.pdf

[27] Pramod Kumar Navratna v. State of Chhattisgarh & Ors., 2026 INSC 124, arising out of SLP (Crl.) No. 4452 of 2025 (Supreme Court of India, 5 February 2026). https://indiankanoon.org/doc/14661038/

[28] Anusaya Raosaheb Navpute and Another v. State of Maharashtra and Another, Criminal Application Nos. 2117 and 2118 of 2026, 2026:BHC-AUG:30353 (Bombay High Court, 23 July 2026). https://indiankanoon.org/doc/46674534/

[29] Anurag Soni v. State of Chhattisgarh, (2019) 13 SCC 1.

[30] Joseph Shine v. Union of India, (2019) 3 SCC 39.

[31] Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) v. Union of India, (2017) 10 SCC 1.

[32] Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India, (2018) 10 SCC 1.

[33] Shafin Jahan v. Asokan K.M., (2018) 16 SCC 368.

[34] Vimal Vijay v. Union of India & Ors., W.P.(C) No. 31598 of 2024 (Kerala High Court, order issuing notice, 9 September 2024). https://www.verdictum.in/court-updates/high-courts/vimal-vijay-v-union-of-india-ors-wpc-no-31598-2024-rape-false-promise-to-marry-1551006

Downloads

Published

05-08-2026

Data Availability Statement

All data underlying this qualitative comparative legal analysis consists of publicly accessible legal texts, statutes, and court rulings. No proprietary or new datasets were created for this research.

How to Cite

Deconstructing Consent and Culpability: A Critical Evaluation of Section 69 under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. (2026). Journal of Digital Justice and Legal Innovation, 1(1), 42-49. https://ijpress.com/jdjli/article/view/20

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.