Archives

  • Inaugural Issue
    Vol. 1 No. 1 (2026)

    Published on 5 August 2026 as the inaugural issue of the Journal of Digital Justice and Legal Innovation (JDJLI). Its seven double-blind peer-reviewed articles map the legal pressure points created by digital systems: the emotional-manipulation economy built on affective computing and platform persuasion; corporate vulnerability to deepfakes and AI-generated synthetic media; operational translucency as a third mode of algorithmic visibility under the Digital Services Act and the EU AI Act; interpretive debt, the hidden liability organisations accumulate when humans defer sensemaking to automated systems; consent and culpability under Section 69 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023; the right to be forgotten balanced against freedom of information across three jurisdictions; and the reform priorities of Indian legal education in a digitising justice system. The issue's speciality is that doctrinal criminal and constitutional analysis is set beside newly coined governance concepts, establishing the journal's habit of reading technology through law rather than around it.

  • JDJLI - Vol. 1 No. 2 (2026) issue cover

    Second Issue
    Vol. 1 No. 2 (2026)

    Published on 13 September 2026 as the second issue of the Journal of Digital Justice and Legal Innovation (JDJLI). It brings together two double-blind peer-reviewed articles on the enforcement and privacy edges of digital governance. The first designs a legal response protocol for child-labour enforcement in Bilaspur, reading constitutional, labour, education, juvenile-justice, bonded-labour and privacy provisions as one enforceable system for administrators. The second, added on 10 October 2026 as the issue was extended, critically analyses the Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023 alongside the Information Technology Act, 2000 as cloud computing, artificial intelligence and digital technology reshape the Indian judicial system. The issue's speciality is applied legal design: both contributions convert statutory instruments into operational protocols for courts, regulators and district administration rather than stopping at doctrinal commentary.